BRG FH24--how different?

 BRG FH24—how different?

The revenue growth of 2% was low, as the market was subdued and buffeted by the Bed Bath and Beyond bankruptcy which brought about discounting. BRG decided to hold gross margin and therefore suffered some volume loss. All geographies increased GM.

Despite that inventories which have been a cause for concern fell and working capital was released reducing net debt to very comfortable levels.

The result saw softness in the core, more mature and cyclical markets, offset by new products, and new geographies. Cooking (air fryer) and coffee drove revenues, new geographies increased 70% off a low base.

Outlook ebit growth 5-7.5% slightly below estimates, mainly due to lower revenues.

FY24 should be clean overall but BBB will impact fh/sh mix.

Kleenaid reports are now reported by Whirlpool , look at these.

BRG is confident that new products and geographies will drive growth in 2025 and 2026. They sacrificed sales through low promotional activity to hold margins. Want to build share through new products not discounting, should set them up for next year. BRG took GP gains from lower freight etc into both GP and promotions not just promotions looking for share.

Reduced estimates for to 9% cagr for the next 5 years, a buy of around $21.

NPAt margins average around 8% so ok but not a great return.



Please note the disclaimer.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

INVESTMENT CHECKLIST

  CHECKLIST FOR INVESTMENTS Overall I want this to be short enough so that I will use it and long enough to be useful. not War and Peace. In deference to Charlie Munger who continually suggested using a checklist, well I am getting on! Can be built up and on over time. Understandable business Do you understand the positioning of the business versus its competitors, customers and suppliers? What are the critical products, services and relationships? Is the size of the market(s) able to be estimated? Are there existential risks to the business, structural decline, or obsolescence? Operating History EPS growth, consistency/volatility is it forecastable? ROE/GM stability and level. Ability to manage margins. Total asset growth can the business profitably deploy assets. What has the reinvestment rate been? NPM level and stability. Does the business generate FCF, does CF reconcile to earnings? Given the above has the company favourable LT prospects? Management Condu...
Read more

ANALYSIS OF PORTFOLIO RETURNS FOR 2025 - the Good the Bad and the Ugly

  PORTFOLIO RETURN AND ANALYSIS FOR 2025 I use the nearest year-end Friday to rule off results. June Y/e PORTFOLIO BENCHMARK 2025 18.8% 11.5% 2024 20.8% 13.4% 2023 16.9% 7.6% CAGR 19.0% 10.8%   Please note that the portfolio numbers are based on the total market value after deducting fees and taxes, including regulatory, accounting and audit fees. The benchmark has no fees or taxes deducted. There are now large unrealised tax liabilities in the portfolio that may be realised over time. I may highlight these at some point in the future if they become larger. Taxes paid by my SMSF and Company are deducted from the returns, while taxes of the family trust are paid by me separately.  Secondly, the portfolio is the bulk of my wealth, by a large margin, which means this strategy is not a moonshot satellite or absolut...
Read more

2026 Benchmark

  CHANGES FOR THE BENCHMARK 2025/6 Overall, I am fairly satisfied with the benchmark approach that I use. The main point is that it is very broadly based, not dependent on one stock, one sector or influenced unduly one way or the other. Being equally weighted satisfies some of that criterion, and having a spread of sectoral exposure satisfies another. The stocks are almost entirely profitable and are spread in Australian and international markets. The mix for 2025 was 60% profitable Australian companies, 30% quality growth international companies and 10% Australian speculative companies. All equally weighted. The trouble with this approach is not in benchmark composition or structure, but that, in reality, the likelihood of my investing significant sums in a speculative investment is small. For 2026, I plan to change the benchmark to be 60% profitable Australian and 40% international quality growth. Almost all of these companies should, in theory and reality, be possible cont...
Read more