CAR FH24 top 10 holding--new acquisitions so far so good.

 CAR GROUP FH24 – Acquisitions so far so good

As part of my top 10 holdings reviews, I comment on the CAR result.

There have been significant changes for CAR over the last couple of years. Total assets have increased from $1.9b to $4.7B, with a like increase in equity. The main contributors have been the dual acquisition of Trader Interactive in the US and Webmotors in Brazil. Cleverly, CAR did these acquisitions after having an existing equity exposure so that some higher level of due diligence was available.

After a few years of solid but lowish growth, the last three years have seen an acceleration.



see pg 8 of CAR FH24 presentation :(





The interesting question is what is driving this growth and is it sustainable?

The core Australian business of a car-selling website has shown solid double-digit revenue growth and improving margins over this whole period (ex C19), however, the group growth was not reflective of this performance.

Several missteps in tyre reselling and finance detracted from returns and well as seeing off some competition. There was also significant investment into new products. The charitable conclusion is that now those investments are paying off. The acceleration also coincides with the offshore acquisitions. The size of these acquisitions makes it imperative that they work, and importantly the early signs are good.

The new products include dynamic pricing in the private space, Instant offer, improving digital retailing to increase listings, completions, and ease of transactions, moves to improve depth, and finance options, in Korea Home delivery and guarantee products, and an overall strengthening and expansion of the media strategy to get more ads on the site. There has been a lot going on, and the broad strategy is to replicate the Australian success with these products in the foreign markets, which appear to be gaining traction.

FH24 saw perhaps CAR’s strongest result in quite a while, with double-digit growth on all geographies on a CC pro forma basis. Korea seemed to be the only one struggling a bit as an investment phase has been undertaken to embed leadership in the market.

CAR states that the TAM in each market is huge and they play a small part, with only Australia being anywhere near mature. A figure of 7% saturation by CAR in its markets across the world was given. Not too sure of the real relevance here, but management believes they have a lot of potential growth.

CAR geographic mix has now changed markedly with Australia 42% of revenues, NA 25%, LATAM 16%, Asia 11%. Australia was 72% in 2019.

Car dominates various markets, compared to the nearest competitor, 7.6X Australia, NA 3X, Korea 6X and Brazil 2X. There is an understanding that dominance is necessary in their markets and further investment to entrench the company is undertaken to further embed the business to create a virtuous cycle of cashflows and reinvestment and furthering the lead, well understood by most players in these markets from what I can see. (same as REA)

CAR has a history of strong cash conversion and cash generation (outside of C19). The acquisitions were made with equity calls that negatively impacted ROE but left the ND/EBITDA around 1.8X and likely to reduce, so it is comfortable. There was a slight EBITDA margin dilution as well as the international margins are lower, but not significantly.

The outlook given was that the car market is good. Supply post-C19 has normalised, the consumer is confident, and good growth in revenues and EBITDA are expected for the rest of FY24.

Not the tax rate is low (20%) as the TI acquisition gave rise to acquisition tax losses, amortisation is large. Not too sure of the trajectory I have assumed a gentle normalisation.

The ability to deliver strong double-digit growth will be tested over time, imo. Cars, trucks etc are not houses or apartments. The well of opportunities is not that deep. There is good business momentum and a firm strategy to execute the apparent growth in international operations, but it is likely to saturate after a few years. Therefore, I am unwilling to pay a full PE at the end of this growth period at this stage. The shares at $33.50 are fair but full. Little room for mishaps. At this time CAR is a good value of around $24, IMO.

Disc help top 10 holding, last buy levels $19.95, last sell $29.95, average profit/loss adjusted cost base, $8.74.

 

 Please note the disclaimer.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Performance Review FY2024--

  REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE fy2024 The numbers are in for 2024. The portfolio generated 20.8% (after costs and some cash taxes [1] ), the benchmark return was 13.4%. I am satisfied with the result, considering all things. What are all things? Was I in the fortunate receipt of much good luck (or bad luck), or did I utilise much higher risk in a rising market? Did style assist me? Does the result differ from what could be considered a random outcome (that is the hardest to assess)? I will attempt to address some of these in the following text. The following post will be divided into several sections addressing various segments. To reiterate my investment philosophy is to buy quality companies when they are reasonably priced. Of course, this sets a conscious boundary on likely results, up and down. I am consciously setting a limit on risk by skewing the portfolio almost totally to quality growth companies with a long history of profitable businesses. The belief is that over the long...
Read more

INVESTMENT CHECKLIST

  CHECKLIST FOR INVESTMENTS Overall I want this to be short enough so that I will use it and long enough to be useful. not War and Peace. In deference to Charlie Munger who continually suggested using a checklist, well I am getting on! Can be built up and on over time. Understandable business Do you understand the positioning of the business versus its competitors, customers and suppliers? What are the critical products, services and relationships? Is the size of the market(s) able to be estimated? Are there existential risks to the business, structural decline, or obsolescence? Operating History EPS growth, consistency/volatility is it forecastable? ROE/GM stability and level. Ability to manage margins. Total asset growth can the business profitably deploy assets. What has the reinvestment rate been? NPM level and stability. Does the business generate FCF, does CF reconcile to earnings? Given the above has the company favourable LT prospects? Management Condu...
Read more

Post Results--Examining the tail--PXA MIN CKF DMP SHL IEL DDR

  EXAMINING THE TAIL—PXA DMP RMD IEL DDR SHL MIN Almost all of my top 10 holdings are clear of significant issues with maybe valuation being the main point of conjecture. These investments represent a large proportion of the funds deployed. There is also a tail these are small or middling positions as launching pads to potential further investment but with current issues that may preclude investors from becoming overly excited about them. Therefore, they have potential attractive upsides. The underlying business should be sound and the issues short term. These holdings can be upscaled if the issues are indeed ST, however, not all will turn out favourably. How are these going? This is not an in-depth analysis but an overview of the short-term issues, are these issues becoming better or worse? Pexa (PXA) My thesis here rests with the Australian business being a natural monopoly, that appears intact. Secondly, Australian success can be repeated in the UK. Success in the UK rem...
Read more